State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Anything mage specific not covered by any of the other subforums, like raid instance guides for mages.
Krieger
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 2:47 pm
Contact:

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Krieger Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:18 pm

I didn't manage to log in today, so there goes my question. Komma said that the hotfixes were applied, but mmo champion states that "Please note that the following class tuning changes are still undergoing testing and will be implemented as soon as possible.".

I haven't logged in yet for today. Can anyone here confirm whether the changes are live in Europe ?
Boomop
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:04 am

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Boomop Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:23 pm

I haven't paid much attention to Fire during the past 3 weeks. Now that I see these results, I may as well put down a few questions here so as to catch up:

1. How is the increased crit making UM more valuable? More Fireball crits means more chances for UM to do extra damage, but with more crit there will be more Pyro and less Fireball, which seems to diminish the value of UM.

2. Can the strength of Met be ascribed solely or largely to its adding to the Ignite pool for higher quality Combustion?

3. With extra crit, we should be able to see more Pyros shot onto the PC during the small time window. Has the damage composition in the "pet - prismatic_crystal" table seen any visible change due to this?
1) From messing around on Beta, more Pyros was a good thing for UM (and Fire DPS as a whole). The advantage of UM is that every GCD can be used to generate Ignite (Mastery). You are also only casting things that generate Pyro procs (rather than refreshing a DoT every 12 secs). Another good thing in favor of UM. Both of these things are dmg that can't be directly compared to its counterparts (LB and BW), as UM's dmg is more than ~its~ dmg.

UM also doesn't Crit independently -- which means it inherits both Critical Mass and Pyrotechnics.

2) Probably. On top of that, Meteor is really easy to use compared to say, PC.

3) I'm not sure this will change much in that respect. Particularly when the 2 and 4 pc gets involved.

Once again, Fire's AoE just looks gross, while single target is still lackluster. I'm really not sure what Blizzard is thinking.

Still thinking the 2pc should be baselined. And the 4pc is problematic. A RNG 100% Crit is not really what a class that stacks Crit wants. Especially when we can force Pyro procs with IB (and the 2pc). You might see some Min/Maxxers going heavy into secondaries other than Crit to play RNG lotto.
gillon
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:15 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby gillon Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:39 pm

Are the changes live yet? My FB is doing tooltip damage.
minimemage
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 4:32 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby minimemage Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:50 pm

Hi Komma,

Thanks for the amazingly quick update. Do you know why there is a discrepancy between your numbers in the OP and the T17N sample output on simulationcraft.org? That arcane T17N is top with 34.7k vs. yours at 30.7k

edit: Thought about it more - is it the set bonuses?
User avatar
Failish
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:30 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Failish Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:52 pm

Thank you Komma!
User avatar
Kasc
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Kasc Tue Dec 09, 2014 4:09 pm

According to SimC my DPS will be better as frost until I get more mastery/haste gear.

Report: http://simc.hostoi.com/mage_specs_10k_iterations.html" target="_blank

tl;dr:

Image

I'm not really surprised by this. Most of my gear is MS/Crit
Teri
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:55 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Teri Tue Dec 09, 2014 5:58 pm

I am curious to know the mastery stat weight now with the buff to crit for fire I am sitting at 38% crit self buff no food.

Also I can understand arcane is better in static fight but when movement is involve fire is way better in my opinion.
User avatar
Dutchmagoz
Administrator
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 11:53 am

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Dutchmagoz Tue Dec 09, 2014 7:04 pm

Comparisons between highmaul gear only:

Image

Source: http://pastebin.com/g3BZ90v8" target="_blank

In no way is this 100% BiS or 100% optimal, but it's quite close for all 3 specs.
Owner of Altered Time.

Twitch - Twitter - Arcane Guide (AT) - Arcane Guide (IV) - Fire Guide

For any issues with a moderator or the website, send me a PM!
User avatar
Kasc
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:51 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Kasc Tue Dec 09, 2014 8:07 pm

Question:

Is it worth transitioning in to Arcane for progress if you already have good Frost gear?
gillon
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:15 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby gillon Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:16 pm

Question:

Is it worth transitioning in to Arcane for progress if you already have good Frost gear?
All things considered, I'd probably say no. I think you'll find frost performing better in most actual encounters, with arcane outshining it in very stationary ones.
Cid
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Cid Tue Dec 09, 2014 11:07 pm

People keep throwing out the 'gearing for spec x' talk, but there really isn't much, if any, gear diversity in Highmaul. The most diversity you are going to get is through enchants and gems and I don't see too many people spending 10k+ on every raid to re-enchant their gear to do 800 more DPS on Butcher when hes probably already faceroll at that point anyway.

I suspect that unless your guild is truly stuck on Butcher or Tectus and the extra few DPS that Arcane or Fire might bring would give you the boost your guild needs to get the kill then there will be no reason to ever play anything but Frost in Highmaul.
zhengma
Posts: 213
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 7:50 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby zhengma Tue Dec 09, 2014 11:30 pm

People keep throwing out the 'gearing for spec x' talk, but there really isn't much, if any, gear diversity in Highmaul. The most diversity you are going to get is through enchants and gems and I don't see too many people spending 10k+ on every raid to re-enchant their gear to do 800 more DPS on Butcher when hes probably already faceroll at that point anyway.

I suspect that unless your guild is truly stuck on Butcher or Tectus and the extra few DPS that Arcane or Fire might bring would give you the boost your guild needs to get the kill then there will be no reason to ever play anything but Frost in Highmaul.
As an off-topic sidenote, at my level of play and at the level my guild plays, here is the deal for Butcher (and actually many other encounters): let one who does 8000 less DPS than SimC predicts to do 4000 less is as effective as, but immensely easier than letting 8 raiders who does 500 less DPS than SimC predicts to do as much as SimC says.

Or, if the guild master/raid leader has either advanced diplomatic skill or the heart of stone and iron, persuading the one who does 8000 less DPS than SimC predicts to port out of the instance is also a valid idea.

However, these realistic subtleties in no way diminish the value of the data presented in this post. Until the next hotfix, Arcane has the potential to do more damage than Frost, given sufficient preparation in gearing (gemming, enchanting) and proficiency in minimizing the DPS loss due to movement. Even though I am too minmaxed towards Frost to return at this moment, some fresh 100 can still gear towards Arcane for Highmaul. Arcane, at least, has become a valid option.
Image
User avatar
Resshin
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 4:03 am

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Resshin Sat Dec 13, 2014 12:02 pm

Do you think this will be the last balance patch before 6.1? I kind of want to swap some enchants/reroll some of my crafted gear, but I feel as if arcane might be toned down a little. I also feel fire is going to have a few more changes.
User avatar
Festen
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:19 am

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Festen Sat Dec 13, 2014 12:15 pm

Good question Resshin, I think there will be one or two hotfixes but not so important.
Personally, I'd switch to arcane when BRF will open, what do you think about it guys?
User avatar
Komma
Administrator
Posts: 1486
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 7:37 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Komma Sun Dec 14, 2014 5:55 am

Do you think this will be the last balance patch before 6.1? I kind of want to swap some enchants/reroll some of my crafted gear, but I feel as if arcane might be toned down a little. I also feel fire is going to have a few more changes.
I doubt that there will be any nerfs for the rest of Highmaul, for the same "don't nerf classes because guilds are relying on them for progression" reasoning they've mentioned.
Admin of Altered Time.

Have an issue with the website or moderation? Send me a PM!
willemh
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:24 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby willemh Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:29 pm

Now that they nerfed the procrate on the cheap weapon enchant, is mark of the frostwolf clearly better again?
User avatar
Berlinia
Posts: 320
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 11:11 pm
Location: Frenikk's house

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Berlinia Mon Dec 15, 2014 2:02 am

Small interesting thing, the mage from Scrubbusters played Fire for multiple kills!
Idyar
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:32 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Idyar Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:18 pm

Hey Komma, is there somewhere I could get all the .simc you used to generate the talent comparisons? I would like to mess around with them and would be great if I didn't have to start from scratch. Maybe drop them in your http://downloads.simulationcraft.org/Komma/" target="_blank if they are somewhere else. Thanks!
User avatar
Garrod
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 5:11 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Garrod Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:24 am

Fire definitely viable on Mythic Kargath haha: https://www.warcraftlogs.com/rankings/6 ... class=Mage" target="_blank

Image
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/character/v ... d/advanced Fire for Mythic Raiding
<Side Project> 7/7 Mythic Highmaul 5/10 Mythic Blackrock Foundry
User avatar
Komma
Administrator
Posts: 1486
Joined: Wed May 28, 2014 7:37 pm

Re: State of the Specs (Dec 8, pre-Mythic Highmaul)

Unread postby Komma Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:06 am

Hey Komma, is there somewhere I could get all the .simc you used to generate the talent comparisons? I would like to mess around with them and would be great if I didn't have to start from scratch. Maybe drop them in your http://downloads.simulationcraft.org/Komma/" target="_blank if they are somewhere else. Thanks!
Er...the simc files I used are kinda tailored to my folders, but essentially they just do 27 copies and adjust talents/glyphs. They're ugly and not really suited for public use. :oops:
Fire definitely viable on Mythic Kargath haha:
Upstairs LB cleave? I can see that work pretty nicely.
Admin of Altered Time.

Have an issue with the website or moderation? Send me a PM!

Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests